Back to work

Sling TV

Defining a World-Class Live TV Experience for Sling TV

Led a comprehensive UX strategy and redesign proposal to re-center Sling TV around a clear, best-in-class Live TV experience — grounded in customer behavior, usability research, and platform data.

Role
Product Lead, UX
Period
2017
UX StrategyConsumer ProductUsability ResearchNavigation DesignMonetization UX

Sling TV disrupted traditional cable by offering live TV over streaming, but early UX decisions blurred the line between live, on-demand, and transactional content — creating confusion, friction, and churn. I led a comprehensive UX strategy and redesign proposal to re-center Sling TV around a clear, best-in-class Live TV experience, grounded in customer behavior, usability research, and platform data.

Business & Customer Problem

Sling TV faced a structural UX challenge:

  • Customers expected traditional TV behaviors (channel surfing, grid guides, DVR)
  • The product UI increasingly resembled SVOD platforms
  • Content types (Live, SVOD, TVOD) lacked clear differentiation
  • Cancellation drivers pointed to usability, missing DVR, and value perception

A key insight emerged: Sling TV was a live TV service without a clearly defined live TV experience.

Problem framing

Customer research findings

Competitive landscape

UX Strategy & Approach

1. Re-Anchor the Product Around Live TV

Customer data showed viewers watched a small, consistent set of channels (5.9/week on average), reinforcing the need for fast, habitual navigation. We reintroduced and modernized core TV behaviors:

  • Browse-while-watching (Picture-in-Picture)
  • Last five channels recall
  • Directional channel surfing
  • A time-based grid guide
  • Persistent clock for temporal awareness

Strategic intent: Reduce cognitive load and align with deeply learned TV mental models.

Live TV navigation concepts

Grid guide design

Channel surfing UX

PiP browse-while-watching

DVR and favorites

Navigation flows

2. Clarify Content Types & User Intent

Users struggled to understand the difference between Live TV, On-Demand (SVOD), and Transactional (TVOD / Pay-Per-View). We proposed:

  • A distinct Live TV destination
  • Content organized by intent, not internal taxonomy
  • Clear visual and navigational separation between content modes

Usability testing validated the approach with 100% task success rates in identifying content types and finding what was airing live (N=32)

Content type differentiation

Live TV destination design

Content mode navigation

3. Blend Familiar Navigation with Modern Discovery

To avoid alienating traditional TV users while still evolving the platform, we combined:

  • Grid-based navigation for predictability
  • Analytics-driven ribbons that adapt to behavior
  • Smart watchlists for continuity
  • Elevated search as a first-class navigation entry

This hybrid model balanced comfort and exploration.

Navigation hybrid model

Discovery ribbons

Watchlist and search

Behavioral personalization

Channel guide detail

4. Treat Monetization as a UX Problem

Rather than layering revenue features on top of the experience, we integrated them naturally:

  • Freemium access for prospects
  • Contextual upsells for unsubscribed content
  • Simple one-click Extras management
  • DVR simplified through favoriting at series and episode levels

Goal: Align business outcomes with perceived customer value.

Monetization UX

Upsell flows

Extras management

DVR UX

Subscription lifecycle

Value communication

Freemium flows

Upgrade prompts

Outcomes & Impact

While presented as a forward-looking proposal, the work delivered strong validation and alignment:

  • 100% task success in Live TV discovery testing
  • Strong qualitative feedback: "It's just like flipping channels." / "This feels more like TV than most streaming services."
  • A clear UX roadmap aligned to top churn drivers
  • A scalable experience framework for future platform evolution

Outcomes summary

Testing results

Roadmap alignment

Platform framework

Experience vision

Design system components

Final screens

What I'd Do Differently Today

If I were leading this work now, I would:

  • Push harder on personalization earlier, using real-time behavioral signals to adapt Live TV surfaces dynamically
  • Invest sooner in performance and reliability UX, given buffering and technical issues were top churn drivers
  • Design the experience as cross-device first, accounting for mobile-to-TV handoff patterns
  • More explicitly connect UX decisions to subscription lifecycle metrics (trial → activation → retention)